![]() ![]() Wait, people actually thought metamagic rods wouldn't work this way? That was pretty much spelled out in the rules as such. I myself will probably go by the first option, but I can see an argument for either way, and it is just odd that metamagic rods were a part of the original question, and left out of the faq (presumably) on purpose. Magical Lineage / Wayang Spellhunter - Lone Wolf Development Forums Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. 1, that metamagic rods are included in this ruling, under the "in general" clause, or 2, they are left out of a general ruling because they specifically say "spells of 3rd level or lower" (lesser rods) It was part of the original question, and then left out of the FAQ response. I wish they had just included, or mentioned metamagic rods in that post. ![]() Pathfinder Design Team, 10/18/13And while it doesn't specifically mention Metamagic Rods, the intent seems clear and the bolded text would appear to be a catch all anyway. Heighten Spell is really the only metamagic feat that makes using a higher-level spell slot an advantage instead of a disadvantage. The advantages of the metamagic feat are spelled out in the Benefits section of the feat, and the increased spell slot level is a disadvantage. In general, use the (normal, lower) spell level or the (higher) spell slot level, whichever is more of a disadvantage for the caster. The spell counts as the level of the spell slot necessary to cast it.įor example, an empowered burning hands uses a 3rd-level spell slot, counts as a 3rd-level spell for making concentration checks, counts as a 3rd-level spell for a magus's spell recall or a pearl of power. Metamagic: At what spell level does the spell count for concentration DCs, magus spell recall, or a pearl of power? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |